PDA

View Full Version : Re: <VV> Wheel Backspacing


Joe West
05-30-2005, 05:46 PM
------------------------------



Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:43:19 -0500

From: Joe Curran <espace@MIT.EDU>

Re: <VV> Wheel Backspacing



> I am planning a Corvair hauler, based on GMC Transmode rear airbag

> suspensions. To maximize the width between the airbags, I need wheels with

> a large offset. (I don't have hubs or wheels for the Transmode.) I don't

> recall from previous discussions which direction is "positive" and which is

> "negative." The direction I need is the direction that puts the wheel

> deeper into the wheelwell. I measured some early 70's Toronado wheels at

> a junkyard yesterday, and they have the desired offset, but a couple inches

> too much of it.

> Is there a wheel reference that includes the offset amount and direction?



Ryon,



You pointed out exactly why the term "offset" is pretty much useless.

The term you want is "backspacing", and is a measure of the distance from

the inside rim to the hub mouning plate. (See Bryan Blackwell's site,

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/9164/tires.html,

if you need a diagram). You should still know the wheel width, but

backspacing is much more intuitive.



What you want is a wheel with a lot of backspacing. Modern GM cars seem

to be headed in this direction. FWD cars tend to have lots of backspacing

(as a percentage of the total wheel width). Also the latest generation of

Camaros, among others.



Good luck,

- -Joe Curran

espace@mit.edu



'66 Corvair Monza coupe w/'67 110, '66 PG/3.55 posi diff

Gen II F-body wheels, 15x7", 3.75" backspacing.





/"\

\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign

X Against HTML Mail

/ \